Connect with us

Tech

Modern Warfare Will Show You Your Kill-Death Ratio For $20

Published

on

One of the most requested features of Call of Duty: Modern Warfare is a column of deaths on the board for each mode. Although it may seem a trivial addition, it is completely devoid of modalities like Team Deathmatch and has been since its launch. However, as part of the recent Mother Russia package, players can buy the chance to see their death for $ 20.

 

Image result for Modern Warfare charges $20 to show players how many times they’ve died in a match

 

The function comes in the form of a clock in the game called “Time to Die”. The clock shows the number of deaths and deaths you have in the game and is something you can watch during a normal game. While most of the game’s watches are purely aesthetic, Time to Die, which allows players to see hidden statistics, seems like a possible advantage. Someone who is having a bad round may decide to play more prudently instead of continuing to take action, for example.

The deaths are a statistic that players have asked to add to the board since Modern Warfare was launched earlier this year. Key statistics are absent in modes such as the Team Deathmatch where deaths and deaths are the only currency that counts to win the game.

Deaths are also an important part of the death / death relationship that has become a community standard for judging performance. The idea is that if you get more deaths than deaths in matches, you automatically get a net advantage for your team, because even in objective game modes,

 

 

Image result for Modern Warfare charges $20 to show players how many times they’ve died in a match

 

 

it is useful to take a player from the opposing team. However, not being able to see how many times you are dead, at least until the end of the game, makes it difficult to keep track of this metric during a game. Unless you pay $ 20 for the watch, of course.

Infinity Ward has not explained why the statistics are not present, but it is likely that this is an effort to curb toxicity, so players cannot be intimidated or discouraged for poor performance. This is a strategy that other Activision / Blizzard games, like Overwatch (which has no board at all) and Heroes of the Storm (which shows specifically customized statistics instead of things like murders and deaths).

But although those games have other goals, the main focus on Modern Warfare’s Team Deathmatch is nothing more than scoring more murders than the enemy team, making the deaths a critical statistic.

According to the Modern Warfare game store, the Time to Die watch is a limited-time item, so it’s likely to disappear soon. It is not clear if another watch will show death to replace it, or if the function simply disappears from the game again.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tech

GTA IV has disappeared from Steam because of Games for Windows Live

Published

on

 

WTF?! If you’ve encountered the annoyingly annoying problem of old Windows Live games that don’t work, Rockstar has a solution: don’t buy them. The company was satisfied that it removed GTA IV from Steam due to the problems caused by the Microsoft Games for Windows Live platform, although in theory it could be solved with an update. Confused? Me too.

 

Image result for GTA IV has disappeared from Steam because of Games for Windows Live

 

You may or may not have noticed that Grand Theft Auto IV is no longer available on Steam. Although it’s an old game, it could be said to be the best game in the GTA series. The removal of the purchase link from your page was due to problems with the Microsoft Games for Windows Live (GFWL) platform. Rockstar confirmed that this is the case in a statement to The Verge:

“Grand Theft Auto IV was originally created for the Games For Windows Live platform. Since Microsoft is no longer compatible with Games For Windows Live, it is no longer possible to generate the additional keys necessary to continue selling the current version of the game. We are looking for other options to distribute GTA IV for PC and will share more information as soon as possible. ”

Microsoft closed the Windows Live game store in 2013, marking the beginning of a phasing out of the platform which was launched in 2007. Finally, Redmond decided that it made no sense to continue supporting GFWL in competition with Xbox Live and the support ended in 2014. Players could only redeem points on one or the other. Furthermore, it intervened in its cross-compatibility plans.

Since the removal of the platform, many users have complained that GFWL is causing problems with some games, including GTA IV. Although alternative solutions exist, they are quite complicated. So much so that people have published long guides on how to run the game.

In light of this, Rockstar has decided to stop selling it until it finds a distribution solution that works. Apparently, the company believes that removing GFWL from a twelve-year title is not part of the budget, but has not specifically excluded it as an option. However, it may not have been as problematic if the study had addressed the problem like other editors in 2013, when it was clear that the problematic platform was coming out.

Even more confusing is that Rockstar did not update the game two years ago to eliminate expired songs. Of course, deleting the song files and changing the code that calls them is a much simpler solution than trying to fix the GFWL disaster.

Continue Reading

Tech

A new MacBook could be in the works, according to Apple regulatory filing

Published

on

What just happened? It’s a new year and with it comes the usual influx of product rumors, teasing and regulatory presentations. Today’s news falls into the latter category: a mysterious new Apple product has appeared in the databases of the Eurasian Economic Commission and, although the details are scarce, there are reasons why MacBook fans get excited.

 

Image result for A new MacBook could be in the works, according to Apple regulatory filing

The product was first seen by 9to5Mac and bears the model number “A2289”. In particular, the presentation (which has been approved) attached to the article refers to a “personal laptop”, which is the perfect description for a new MacBook.

However, if that’s not enough, the presentation also indicates that the device will run macOS 10.15. Unless Apple plans to implement the desktop operating system on its mobile devices, a new MacBook is almost confirmed. However, as we said, other details are unknown: we are not sure what the screen size or resolution will be, nor do we know how much the device will cost or what new features it will have.

That said, we can make some informed assumptions. As 9to5Mac points out, it would be logical for the next MacBook to introduce Apple’s old (but golden) scissor switches, the predecessor of the notoriously unreliable butterfly keyboard design that has hit Mac users in recent years.

The next laptop will likely be 13 inches in size, as Apple launched a 16-inch MacBook with scissor switches a couple of months ago. However, this is pure speculation and Apple may have something completely different up its sleeve (perhaps a new MacBook Air).

However, we are excited to see what this mysterious notebook will look like. There is likely to be an announcement or at least a provocation for the device at some point in the next three or four months (or less, if we’re lucky).

Continue Reading

Tech

Princeton study: US carriers do little to protect customers from SIM-swap attacks

Published

on

In summary: if you use SMS for two-factor authentication in your online accounts, you can change it as soon as possible. According to Princeton researchers, five of the major U.S. operators. UU. They are doing little to protect you from SIM exchange attacks, which offers attackers an easy way to reset their passwords and access their confidential data or impersonate online.

Image result for Princeton study: US carriers do little to protect customers from SIM-swap attacks

While it’s always a good idea to use multi-factor authentication to protect your online accounts, it doesn’t mean you’re completely safe from anyone who wants to steal sensitive personal data.

According to a Princeton University study, five of the major prepaid U.S. operators. UU. They don’t protect it from something that experts call a “SIM swap” attack. We have covered this type of theft several times in the past.

The way it works is for an attacker to convince an operator to reassign the victim’s phone number to a new SIM card without going through all the standard security questions to verify his identity. This effectively allows the scammer to hijack someone’s account and use two-factor authentication to reset passwords on important online accounts such as emails and bank accounts.

The researchers signed up to 50 prepaid accounts in Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile, US Mobile and Tracfone and spent much of 2019 looking for ways to trick call center operators into linking their phone numbers to a new one. SIM. What they found was that they only needed to successfully respond to a security challenge to do so, even after multiple unsuccessful attempts, which claimed not to raise any warning signs.

After intentionally providing incorrect PINs, they were asked to verify other details such as postal codes or other information about the owner of the real account. Investigators told call center employees that they could not remember that the information at that time the standard procedure seemed to be to ask for the last two calls made from their number.

This is the weakness that makes the process exploitable. Attackers can easily trick someone into calling specific numbers by using websites that promise one thing or another. The researchers also found that 17 of the 140 online services that use SMS for two-factor authentication don’t use any other method to verify their identity, which makes it even easier for scammers to commit identity theft or steal information. Personnel of the victims.

Princeton experts have informed operators and T-Mobile told them earlier this month that they no longer use call logs as an authentication method. Others, such as Verizon and US Mobile, said they had received less than 1% of SIM exchange requests over the phone and continuously updated their cybersecurity practices.

The obvious conclusion is to avoid using SMS as a two-factor form of authentication and instead use an authentication application. For those of you who own an Android phone, Google allows you to use the phone as a two-factor physical authentication key, which is the safest method there is.

Continue Reading

Trending